Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund Shares Approach 52-Week High - Market Mover
The shares closed 1.5% below its 52-week high of $15.90, with trading volume higher than its 30 day average
Apr 08, 2021 by Kwhen Finance Editors
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund shares closed today at 1.5% below its 52 week high of $15.90, giving the company a market cap of $744M. The stock is currently up 0.4% year-to-date, up 12.3% over the past 12 months, and up 23.6% over the past five years. This week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.9%, and the S&P 500 rose 2.7%.
Trading Activity
- Trading volume this week was 4.7% lower than the 20-day average.
- Beta, a measure of the stock’s volatility relative to the overall market stands at 0.1.
Technical Indicators
- The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the stock was above 70, indicating it may be overbought.
- MACD, a trend-following momentum indicator, indicates an upward trend.
- The stock closed below its Bollinger band, indicating it may be oversold.
- The stock closed at 0.5% higher than its 5-day moving average, 1.9% higher than its 20-day moving average, and 1.3% higher than its 90-day moving average.
Market Comparative Performance
- The company's share price is the same as the S&P 500 Index , lags it on a 1-year basis, and lags it on a 5-year basis
- The company's share price is the same as the Dow Jones Industrial Average , lags it on a 1-year basis, and lags it on a 5-year basis
Name | DoD %Δ | YTD %Δ | 1 Yr % | 52-Week H % | 52-Week L % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | -0.1 | 0.4 | 12.3 | -1.4 | 20.4 |
Dow Jones Industrial Average | 0.8 | 11.0 | 45.3 | -0.7 | 49.9 |
S&P 500 Index | 0.7 | 10.4 | 50.3 | -0.8 | 52.9 |
Technology Industry | -2.9 | -30.6 | -86.1 | -86.3 | 4.1 |
This story was produced by the Kwhen Automated News Generator. For more articles like this, please visit us at finance.kwhen.com. Write to editors@kwhen.com. © 2021 Kwhen Inc.
Was this content valuable for you?
Tags: